View source for Orientation to GenderIT.org

== '''Welcome to the GenderIT.org family!''' ==


Hi and welcome to GenderIT.org. While we aren't a big site or organisation, we work virtually and rarely meet face to face, so it can be a little difficult to orient your way round the site. This guide is designed to help you understand a bit about who we are and what we do, through some reading suggestions and links that will help you learn a bit more about the work we do.

'''GenderIT.org? Where did it come from?'''

GenderIT.org is a programme under the Women's Rights Programme (WRP) of the Association for Progressive Communications (APC). It started as a site monitoring policy developments on ICT and gender, and from its beginnings has been unique. Initially it was one of the first sites looking at ICT policy developments through a gender lens. More sites and individuals are now doing this, reflecting both the growth of the internet and the growing awareness of online misogyny. However, GenderIT.org remains a unique space for its focus on the Global South, its focus on those working at a grassroots level (that is grounded in the experience of the women in the society in which they live), and for its emphasis on both advocacy and social justice.

'''If you are contributing, there's some essential reading'''

Read this document on [our core values], and this one on [our code of ethics].

We've developed these guides on [digital story-telling], [audio] and [photography], that look at why a gender lens is important when putting together a story. Here there are guides to each of the sections on GenderIT.org, and this page could help if you're new to working with a group online – where meeting face to face is very rare. 

Lastly we have a [growing FAQ], and if you have a question that isn't answered here, let us know.

'''I want to know more...'''

The best thing is to take a look through some of the work that has been published on the site. The articles below should give you an idea of the different styles of writing on the site, from the more personal blog posts, to the heavier policy research. It also reflects some of the geographic diversity of the articles on the site, and should orient you to some of the key issues we deal with.

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/lets-go-beyond-basics-what-would-feminist-internet-governance-look Let's go beyond the basics: What would feminist internet governance look like?] 

This editorial summarises and links to the main arguments on why a feminist perspective illuminates debates on internet governance. Together the articles look at the difficulties of getting gender onto the table, violence against women online and provides an outline of the debates taking place in Latin American forums.


[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/digital-misogyny-it-felt-514-people-had-raped-me-all-over-again Digital misogyny: “It felt like 514 people had raped me all over again”] 

This disturbing story shows a contrasting style. While this blog does not share the author's point of view, common and welcome in the Feminist Talk section, it is a story that documents a harrowing instance of digital misogyny, and personal bravery, giving strong if anecdotal support to the work done to introduce a feminist perspective to internet governance, grounded in local concerns and experiences.


[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/agency A is for Agency]

It's not all doom and gloom. This is an editorial that links to ways in which feminist initiatives are making a difference, getting change implemented in myriad ways.


[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/good-women-girls-and-hiv-morality-over-health-commission-status-women Good women, girls and HIV: Morality over health at the Commission on the Status of Women] 

This article shows one of the aspects of event coverage, but don't take this as the only or even the best way of covering events. Our event coverage ranges from hard-hitting policy discussions to equally important anecdotes on personal experience. This is included in the list partly to give some ideas on event coverage, but also to introduce the concerns we at GenderIT.org have about the way the 'porn debate' is framed, a language of protection, rather than language focusing on harm prevention. 


[http://www.genderit.org/node/3985 Leading up to the Beijing Review: Strategising for Section J]

Written by ISIS International, a feminist media organisation, this statement shows the groundwork and planning that goes in before heading to an event, and how APC and progressive allies work to build coalitions that are capable of influencing debate.


[http://www.genderit.org/articles/survey-sexual-activism-morality-and-internet Survey on sexual activism, morality, and the internet] 

This is one of GenderIT's most-read articles, and looks at the evidence-based reporting and research that is essential to advocacy and policy change. The EROTICS reports are all essential reading for those who want to understand how the internet functions, how it is used and who benefits or is harmed by current policy initiatives.

== '''How to write''' ==


This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

== '''... a feminist talk''' ==

A feminist talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, ''no more than 500 words'', but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a feminist talk piece to be spell and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

''Check previous feminist talks for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

== '''… an analytical article''' ==


Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be ''between 1,500 and 2,500 words''.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

''Check previous analytical articles for reference:'' 

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?] 

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

== '''… an interview''' ==


The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered. 

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

''Check previous interviews for reference:'' 

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also: [http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php?title=How_to_deal_with_vulnerable_interviewees&action=edit&redlink=1 Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]

== '''… an editorial''' ==


Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is ''no more than one page, or 350 words''. 

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

''Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

== '''… a resource summary''' ==
  

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written? 
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered? 
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable) 
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out? 
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is ''between 500-700 words''.

See example: [http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study EROTICS: Sex, rights and the internet - an exploratory research study] 

''Read more:'' 

[http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

[http://www.apc.org/system/files/multilingual_audience_guidelines.pdf Writing for a multilingual audience]: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers. 

[http://www.apc.org/en/system/files/APCReferenceGuide_200905.pdf APC reference guide]: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

== '''Checklist for ALL articles''' ==


Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain these elements:

''Heading:'' This is where you persuade readers that they should read your story.

''Summary or lead:'' One or two sentences that summarise the main point of your article, again to persuade the reader to read further.

''Biography:'' Two or three lines describing who you are – even if you are writing anonymously this could give readers some context of the work that you do.

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.




== '''[[How to publish content in GenderIT.org]]''' ==