How to write for GenderIT.org

2016-06-24T02:04:16Z

Flavia: /* Checklist for ALL articles */

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]

=='''How to write'''==

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

==='''...a Feminist Talk'''===

A Feminist Talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, no more than 500 words, but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

Check previous feminist talks for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

==='''…an analytical article'''===

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be between 1,500 and 2,500 words.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

Check previous analytical articles for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

==='''…an interview'''===

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

Check previous interviews for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also :
'''[[Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

==='''…an editorial'''===

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is no more than one page, or 350 words.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

==='''…a resource summary'''===

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?

2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?

3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)

4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?

5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?

6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is between 500-700 words.

See example: http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study

Read more: [http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

Writing for a multilingual audience: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.
APC reference guide: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

=='''Checklist for ALL articles'''==

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain the elements detailed in this checklist spreadsheet: [[Media:Checklist]]

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

How to write for GenderIT.org

2016-06-24T02:00:20Z

Flavia: /* Checklist for ALL articles */

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]

=='''How to write'''==

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

==='''...a Feminist Talk'''===

A Feminist Talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, no more than 500 words, but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

Check previous feminist talks for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

==='''…an analytical article'''===

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be between 1,500 and 2,500 words.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

Check previous analytical articles for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

==='''…an interview'''===

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

Check previous interviews for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also :
'''[[Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

==='''…an editorial'''===

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is no more than one page, or 350 words.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

==='''…a resource summary'''===

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?

2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?

3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)

4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?

5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?

6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is between 500-700 words.

See example: http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study

Read more: [http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

Writing for a multilingual audience: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.
APC reference guide: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

=='''Checklist for ALL articles'''==

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain the elements detailed in this checklist spreadsheet: [[Media:Checklist_before_submitting_a_piece_to_GenderIT.ods]]

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

2016-05-16T23:50:14Z

Flavia:

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]

== '''Welcome to the GenderIT.org family!''' ==

Hello and welcome to GenderIT.org. While we aren't a big site or organisation, we work virtually and rarely meet face to face, so it can be a little difficult to orient your way round the site. This guide is designed to help you understand a bit about who we are and what we do, through some reading suggestions and links that will help you learn a bit more about the work we do.

== '''GenderIT.org: Where did it come from?''' ==

GenderIT.org is a programme under the Women's Rights Programme (WRP) of the Association for Progressive Communications (APC). It started as a site monitoring policy developments on ICT and gender, and from its beginnings it has been unique. Initially it was one of the first sites looking at ICT policy developments through a gender lens. More sites and individuals are now doing this, reflecting both the growth of the internet and the growing awareness of online misogyny. However, GenderIT.org remains a unique space for its focus on the global South, its focus on those working at a grassroots level (grounded in the experience of the women in the society in which they live), and its emphasis on both advocacy and social justice.

== '''If you are contributing, here's some essential reading''' ==

Read this document on [our core values], and this one on [our code of ethics].

We've developed these guides on [digital story-telling], [audio] and [photography], which look at why a gender lens is important when putting together a story. Here there are guides to each of the sections on GenderIT.org, and this page could help if you're new to working with a group online – where meeting face to face is very rare.

Lastly we have a [http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions growing FAQ], and if you have a question that isn't answered here, let us know.

== '''I want to know more...''' ==

The best thing is to take a look through some of the work that has been published on the site. The articles below should give you an idea of the different styles of writing on the site, from the more personal blog posts, to the heavier policy research. They also reflect some of the geographic diversity of the articles on the site, and should orient you to some of the key issues we deal with.

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/lets-go-beyond-basics-what-would-feminist-internet-governance-look Let's go beyond the basics: What would feminist internet governance look like?]

This editorial summarises and links to the main arguments on why a feminist perspective illuminates debates on internet governance, and provides an outline of the debates taking place in Latin American forums.

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/digital-misogyny-it-felt-514-people-had-raped-me-all-over-again Digital misogyny: “It felt like 514 people had raped me all over again”]

This disturbing story shows a contrasting style. While this blog post does not share the author's point of view, common and welcome in the Feminist Talk section, it is a story that documents a harrowing instance of digital misogyny, and personal bravery, giving strong if anecdotal support to the work done to introduce a feminist perspective to internet governance, grounded in local concerns and experiences.

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/agency A is for Agency]

It's not all doom and gloom. This is an editorial that links to ways in which feminist initiatives are making a difference, getting change implemented in myriad ways.

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/good-women-girls-and-hiv-morality-over-health-commission-status-women Good women, girls and HIV: Morality over health at the Commission on the Status of Women]

This article shows one of the aspects of event coverage, but don't take this as the only or even the best way of covering events. Our event coverage ranges from hard-hitting policy discussions to equally important anecdotes on personal experience. This is included in the list partly to give some ideas on event coverage, but also to introduce the concerns we at GenderIT.org have about the way the "porn debate" is framed, in a language of protection, rather than language focusing on harm prevention.

[http://www.genderit.org/node/3985 Leading up to the Beijing Review: Strategising for Section J]

Written by ISIS International, a feminist media organisation, this statement shows the groundwork and planning that goes in before heading to an event, and how APC and progressive allies work to build coalitions that are capable of influencing debate.

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/survey-sexual-activism-morality-and-internet Survey on sexual activism, morality, and the internet]

This is one of GenderIT.org's most-read articles, and looks at the evidence-based reporting and research that is essential to advocacy and policy change. The EROTICS reports are all essential reading for those who want to understand how the internet functions, how it is used and who benefits or is harmed by current policy initiatives.

== '''How to write''' ==

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of articles that appear on GenderIT.org.

== '''... a feminist talk''' ==

A Feminist Talk blog post is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions, and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, ''no more than 500 words'', but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

''Check previous feminist talks for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

== '''… an analytical article''' ==

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be "objective" or "impartial", we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be ''between 1,500 and 2,500 words''.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making, and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

''Check previous analytical articles for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

== '''… an interview''' ==

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

''Check previous interviews for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also: [http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php?title=How_to_deal_with_vulnerable_interviewees&action=edit&redlink=1 Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]

== '''… an editorial''' ==

An editorial usually introduces a GenderIT.org thematic edition, and we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is ''no more than one page, or 350 words''.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference to or quote the particular articles.

''Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

== '''… a resource summary''' ==

Even though resources are usually PDF formatted papers or presentations that are stand-alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of the document/report. Why was it written?
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is ''between 500-700 words''.

See example: [http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study EROTICS: Sex, rights and the internet - an exploratory research study]

''Read more:''

[http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

[http://www.apc.org/system/files/multilingual_audience_guidelines.pdf Writing for a multilingual audience]: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.

[http://www.apc.org/en/system/files/APC_ReferenceGuide_2.0_0.pdf APC reference guide]: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

== '''Checklist for ALL articles''' ==

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain these elements:

''Heading:'' This is where you persuade readers that they should read your story.

''Summary or lead:'' One or two sentences that summarise the main point of your article, again to persuade the reader to read further.

''Biography:'' Two or three lines describing who you are – even if you are writing anonymously this could give readers some context of the work that you do.

Lastly, check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

== '''[[How to publish content in GenderIT.org]]''' ==

Now you have the finalised piece but it is not published on the website yet. This section aims to give you a step-by-step orientation so you can upload all the materials yourself using our Drupal platform.

2016-05-16T11:52:14Z

Flavia:

How to write for GenderIT.org or APCNews

2016-05-16T11:50:55Z

Flavia:

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]
'''How to write'''

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

'''...a Feminist Talk'''

A Feminist Talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, no more than 500 words, but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

Check previous feminist talks for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

'''…an analytical article'''

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be between 1,500 and 2,500 words.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

Check previous analytical articles for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

'''…an interview'''

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

Check previous interviews for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also :
'''[[Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

'''…an editorial'''

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is no more than one page, or 350 words.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

'''…a resource summary'''

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is between 500-700 words.

See example: http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study

Read more: [http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

Writing for a multilingual audience: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.
APC reference guide: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

'''Checklist for ALL articles'''

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain the elements detailed in the [[Media:File:Checklist_before_submitting_a_piece_to_GenderIT.org.ods attached checklist spreadsheet]]

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

How to write for GenderIT.org or APCNews

2016-05-16T11:49:12Z

Flavia:

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]
'''How to write'''

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

'''...a Feminist Talk'''

A Feminist Talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, no more than 500 words, but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

Check previous feminist talks for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

'''…an analytical article'''

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be between 1,500 and 2,500 words.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

Check previous analytical articles for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

'''…an interview'''

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

Check previous interviews for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also :
'''[[Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

'''…an editorial'''

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is no more than one page, or 350 words.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

'''…a resource summary'''

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is between 500-700 words.

See example: http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study

Read more: [http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

Writing for a multilingual audience: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.
APC reference guide: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

'''Checklist for ALL articles'''

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain the elements detailed in the [[File:Checklist_before_submitting_a_piece_to_GenderIT.org.ods_attached_checklist_spreadsheet attached checklist spreadsheet]]

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

How to write for GenderIT.org or APCNews

2016-05-16T11:47:48Z

Flavia:

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]
'''How to write'''

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

'''...a Feminist Talk'''

A Feminist Talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, no more than 500 words, but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

Check previous feminist talks for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

'''…an analytical article'''

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be between 1,500 and 2,500 words.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

Check previous analytical articles for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

'''…an interview'''

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

Check previous interviews for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also :
'''[[Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

'''…an editorial'''

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is no more than one page, or 350 words.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

'''…a resource summary'''

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is between 500-700 words.

See example: http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study

Read more: [http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

Writing for a multilingual audience: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.
APC reference guide: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

'''Checklist for ALL articles'''

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain the elements detailed in the [[Media:Example.ogg]] [[File:Checklist before submitting a piece to GenderIT.org.ods attached checklist spreadsheet]]

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

How to write for GenderIT.org or APCNews

2016-05-16T11:44:27Z

Flavia:

[[File:tool.jpg|thumb|200px]]
'''How to write'''

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

'''...a Feminist Talk'''

A Feminist Talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, no more than 500 words, but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a Feminist Talk piece to be spell- and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

Check previous feminist talks for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

'''…an analytical article'''

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be between 1,500 and 2,500 words.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

Check previous analytical articles for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

'''…an interview'''

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

Check previous interviews for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also :
'''[[Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

'''…an editorial'''

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is no more than one page, or 350 words.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

'''…a resource summary'''

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is between 500-700 words.

See example: http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study

Read more: [http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

Writing for a multilingual audience: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.
APC reference guide: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

'''Checklist for ALL articles'''

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain these elements:

Heading: This is where you persuade readers that they should read your story.

Summary or Lead: One or two sentences that summarise the main point of your article, again to persuade the reader to read further.

Biography: Two or three lines describing who you are – even if you are writing anonymously this could give readers some context of the work that you do.

Please download our checklist spreadsheet to make sure you have covered all the necessary items [File:Checklist before submitting a piece to GenderIT.org.ods here]

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

File:Checklist before submitting a piece to GenderIT.org.ods

2016-05-16T11:44:00Z

Flavia:

Our ideas

2016-05-16T11:39:29Z

Flavia: /* GenderIT.org issue areas */

[[File:coverage.jpg|thumb|200px]]

== '''Write an article based on our ideas''' ==

{| class="wikitable"
!Topic
!Deadline
!Description
!Languages
!Project
!Lead
!Status
|-
|'''The Avocado Matter: An interview with Paz Pena of Derechos Digitales on communications for advocacy'''
|April 2016
|
|ES (EN FR)
|Comms
|Flavia
|
|-
|'''DDoS attack on National Network of Abortion Funders'''
|
|
|EN
|Comms
|Mallory
|assigned to Kendra Moyer
|-
|''' Internet Archive crawls all APC and APC member websites'''
|
|New crawl captures all APC member sites weekly, see https://archive-it.org/static/files/archiveit_brochure.pdf
|EN (ES FR)
|Tech
|Mallory
|
|-
|''' Regional member meeting report from 2015 towards 2016 (with Chat and Karel)'''
|May 2016
|Each region has a report from 2015. Each region has scheduled their meeting for this year.
|EN ES FR
|Network Development
|Karel/Mallory
|
|-
|(Topic)
|(Deadline)
|(Description)
|(Languages)
|(Project)
|(Lead)
|(Status)
|}

== '''Pitch us in our areas of interest''' ==

APCNews covers a variety of topics related to ICTs. However our specialty is in presentation of issues from one or many perspectives as follows: women, the global south, human rights; social movements and civil society.

=== '''APCNews issue areas''' ===

* Access to information: Open access, accessibility, censorship and circumvention.
* Access to internet: internet infrastructure, wireless technology.
* Economic, social and cultural rights in the digital age, also cultural and linguistic diversity.
* Environment and ICTs: Environmental sustainability of ICTs infrastructure and hardware, impacts of ICTs on the environment, ICTs solutions to environmental sustainability.
* Free/libre and open source software
* Freedom of expression: How FX online and offline is impacted by the internet.
* Gender and ICTs including sexual rights
* ICT for development
* ICT policy including internet governance
* Cybersecurity
* Surveillance, right to privacy
* Freedom of association (offline and online) in the digital age and anonymity

=== '''GenderIT.org issue areas''' ===

* Gender and ICT policy
* Access to information
* Sexual and reproductive rights
* Online violence against women
* Surveillance, privacy
* Online safety
* Economic, social and cultural rights on the internet
* ICT for development
* Feminist movements
* Tech development for women
* Access

A guide for new editors

2016-05-16T11:35:05Z

Flavia:

[[File:style.jpg|thumb|200px]]
This is a guide to help editors new to GenderIT.org to understand the priorities for the site and provide a quick reference to important documents that you may need in your work.

== '''Introduction''' ==

The editor is the link between the writer and the audience, and the main aim of the editor is to improve communication between the two. While all stories should follow GenderIT.org style and editorial guidelines, and be in line with the core principles of the site, as far as possible, the editor keeps the words and flow of the original writer. The writer is usually an expert in their field, often with many years of campaigning or struggle in their own country – often in languages that are not English. It is important to respect the writer, and ask them questions and permission for any substantive changes.

It is not always easy to follow these guidelines!

== '''Editing tips''' ==

* Read through the entire piece first. This gives some sense of what the story is about, and often points that are confusing can be clarified later on.

* Use a lighter touch for blogs such as Feminist Talk. Just check for spelling and readability – only if something is very confusing, make an amendment. Always track changes.

* Check for points that are made more than once. If there is new information, try to meld the two together for brevity, and readability.

* Make sure that language is as simple as possible. Writers, especially those fluent in English, may use colloquialisms or long words. It is particularly important for readers whose first language is not English to simplify these. ''Example: '''Time seemed to fly''', the conference was '''so packed''' with exciting speakers. Instead: The conference had lots of exciting speakers.''

* As far as possible check accuracy. If there was an event, check the dates, that names are spelt correctly etc. Google is definitely your friend!

* Check footnotes and references, for both style and completeness. If you think something needs to be referenced, ask for the writer to put that in.

* For some writers (but certainly not all), this may be the first time they are publishing something in English. Your role MAY be to guide and advise them. It is usually clear from the text itself if this is the case. Always phrase guidance respectfully and positively.

* Its important that you encourage the writers to provide as many links within the text as possible. Some writers might not be used to write in online platforms, so we should try to make the text as fluid and rich as possible. The articles can't cover all the contextual information that understanding the content of the article might require, but links can be quite useful for that.

* Editors should also help writers understand how important is to save some time to search in the website and select related articles and resources as much as possible. This way we build on previous writings and we offer the readership a much prolific reading experience. And we increase our chances of readers to get interested in related materials and to stay on the website! Some pieces may need two or three edits. Be prepared!

== '''Editing a translation''' ==

Many of GenderIT.org articles are translations (from English to Spanish or viceversa). Editing translations has its own challenges, since the mediation of the translator is a second voice that shows in the final article. Always edit the translated article with the original in hand, so you can double-check that the translator didn't misunderstand any phrase or word. In some cases, when translators do not understand a very specific word or expression, they might highlight it for your consideration, so be ready to solve that quiz. Going back to the author and asking for synonyms or alternative ways of saying it might help.

== '''Quick links''' ==

*[http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php/Our_code_of_ethics Code of ethics]

*[http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php/Style_guide Style guide]

*[http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php/Editorial_policy Editorial policy]

*[http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php/Reference_guide Reference guide]

== '''Checklist''' ==

1. Does the piece as a whole make sense? Is the argument/ are the points clear? Is there any repetition, and if so, does it serve a purpose?

2. Is the language clear? Are there any colloquialisms? Are there any words or phrases that a person whose first language is not English may have difficulty understanding?

3. Are the grammar and spelling correct?

4. Are all quotes or other materials adequately referenced, following the house style?

5. Is there anything missing? Is there an argument or idea that the writer could have followed up on that would strengthen the article? Are there any suggestions you'd like to make to the writer?

Some pieces may need two or three edits. Be prepared!

Orientation to GenderIT.org

2016-05-16T11:32:31Z

Flavia:

== '''Welcome to the GenderIT.org family!''' ==

Hello and welcome to GenderIT.org. While we aren't a big site or organisation, we work virtually and rarely meet face to face, so it can be a little difficult to orient your way round the site. This guide is designed to help you understand a bit about who we are and what we do, through some reading suggestions and links that will help you learn a bit more about the work we do.

== '''GenderIT.org? Where did it come from?''' ==

GenderIT.org is a programme under the Women's Rights Programme (WRP) of the Association for Progressive Communications (APC). It started as a site monitoring policy developments on ICT and gender, and from its beginnings has been unique. Initially it was one of the first sites looking at ICT policy developments through a gender lens. More sites and individuals are now doing this, reflecting both the growth of the internet and the growing awareness of online misogyny. However, GenderIT.org remains a unique space for its focus on the Global South, its focus on those working at a grassroots level (that is grounded in the experience of the women in the society in which they live), and for its emphasis on both advocacy and social justice.

== '''If you are contributing, there's some essential reading''' ==

Read this document on [our core values], and this one on [our code of ethics].

We've developed these guides on [digital story-telling], [audio] and [photography], that look at why a gender lens is important when putting together a story. Here there are guides to each of the sections on GenderIT.org, and this page could help if you're new to working with a group online – where meeting face to face is very rare.

Lastly we have a [http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions growing FAQ], and if you have a question that isn't answered here, let us know.

== '''I want to know more...''' ==

The best thing is to take a look through some of the work that has been published on the site. The articles below should give you an idea of the different styles of writing on the site, from the more personal blog posts, to the heavier policy research. It also reflects some of the geographic diversity of the articles on the site, and should orient you to some of the key issues we deal with.

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/lets-go-beyond-basics-what-would-feminist-internet-governance-look Let's go beyond the basics: What would feminist internet governance look like?]

This editorial summarises and links to the main arguments on why a feminist perspective illuminates debates on internet governance. Together the articles look at the difficulties of getting gender onto the table, violence against women online and provides an outline of the debates taking place in Latin American forums.

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/digital-misogyny-it-felt-514-people-had-raped-me-all-over-again Digital misogyny: “It felt like 514 people had raped me all over again”]

This disturbing story shows a contrasting style. While this blog does not share the author's point of view, common and welcome in the Feminist Talk section, it is a story that documents a harrowing instance of digital misogyny, and personal bravery, giving strong if anecdotal support to the work done to introduce a feminist perspective to internet governance, grounded in local concerns and experiences.

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/agency A is for Agency]

It's not all doom and gloom. This is an editorial that links to ways in which feminist initiatives are making a difference, getting change implemented in myriad ways.

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/good-women-girls-and-hiv-morality-over-health-commission-status-women Good women, girls and HIV: Morality over health at the Commission on the Status of Women]

This article shows one of the aspects of event coverage, but don't take this as the only or even the best way of covering events. Our event coverage ranges from hard-hitting policy discussions to equally important anecdotes on personal experience. This is included in the list partly to give some ideas on event coverage, but also to introduce the concerns we at GenderIT.org have about the way the 'porn debate' is framed, a language of protection, rather than language focusing on harm prevention.

[http://www.genderit.org/node/3985 Leading up to the Beijing Review: Strategising for Section J]

Written by ISIS International, a feminist media organisation, this statement shows the groundwork and planning that goes in before heading to an event, and how APC and progressive allies work to build coalitions that are capable of influencing debate.

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/survey-sexual-activism-morality-and-internet Survey on sexual activism, morality, and the internet]

This is one of GenderIT.org's most-read articles, and looks at the evidence-based reporting and research that is essential to advocacy and policy change. The EROTICS reports are all essential reading for those who want to understand how the internet functions, how it is used and who benefits or is harmed by current policy initiatives.

== '''How to write''' ==

This page provides an introduction on how to write the different types of article that appear on GenderIT.org.

== '''... a feminist talk''' ==

A feminist talk blog is where you get to be yourself – use more informal language, express opinions and challenge your readers. Feminist Talk pieces are usually quite short, ''no more than 500 words'', but be warned! They are very lightly edited, if at all. If you want a feminist talk piece to be spell and grammar-checked, you need to ask the editorial team.

''Check previous feminist talks for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/trials-confused-feminist-internet-governance-school Trials of a confused feminist (in an internet governance school)]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/facebook-king-laid-bare-and-drag-queens Facebook: The king laid bare and the drag queens]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/why-internet-rights-matter-africans Why internet rights matter for Africa(ns)]

== '''… an analytical article''' ==

Analytical articles are to inform readers about perspectives, issues and debates, putting forward ideas. We don't expect writers to be 'objective' or 'impartial', we expect an informed, well-reasoned feminist perspective. This means in practice that you have to cite your sources, link widely and provide readers with context for your arguments. Analytical articles are expected to be ''between 1,500 and 2,500 words''.

Rather than news conventions, academic conventions are probably most useful here. Make one point per paragraph, cite broadly to illustrate both your expertise and the precedents for your argument, establish early on the argument you are making and guide your reader through the stages that you take to get there. Make sure that when you reference your work thoroughly, particularly when you cite others.

In your analysis you can look at the root causes of an issue, draw links between personal experiences of women and historical and global processes, or examine similarities and differences in manifestation of the issue by people living in different contexts as well as their response to this issue.

''Check previous analytical articles for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/south-africa-pornography-and-internet-justifiable-protection-or-entrenching-patriarchy South Africa: Pornography and the internet – justifiable protection or entrenching patriarchy?]

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/argentina-strategic-use-ict-response-violence-against-women Argentina: Strategic use of ICT as a response to violence against women]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/%E2%80%98does-your-mother-know%E2%80%99-agency-risk-and-morality-online-lives-young-women-mumbai 'Does your mother know?' Agency, risk and morality in the online lives of young women in Mumbai]

== '''… an interview''' ==

The most important thing to remember about interviews is that they are not verbatim transcripts. You are expected to edit the interviewee's words to make them more concise, and easier to understand, but not to censor views or change the meaning of the words.

Ask questions that draw out the interviewee, that help non-experts understand her or his perspective and the importance of that perspective on the subject. Allow them space at the end of the interview to add anything that you may not have already covered.

Lastly, think about the power relations between yourself and the interviewee. Make sure that they are comfortable with the questions beforehand, especially if they are a survivor of violence. If they are in a marginalised or vulnerable position, give them the opportunity to read the final article before it is uploaded, and make sure that they are happy with their portrayal. If the interview was conducted over the phone or similar, quote check – send them the transcript of the quotes you are using from them, to check for accuracy.

''Check previous interviews for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/articles/interview-nana-darkoa-adventures-bedroom-african-woman Interview with Nana Darkoa: Adventures from the bedroom of an African woman]

[http://www.genderit.org/feminist-talk/interview-adolescent-girls-mobile-phone-use-bihar-jharkhand Interview: Adolescent girls' mobile phone use in Bihar, Jharkand, UP]

[http://www.genderit.org/content/copyright-copyleft-why-does-it-matter-interview-heather-ford Copyright? Copyleft? Why does it matter? An interview with Heather Ford]

Read also: [http://writers.wiki.apc.org/index.php?title=How_to_deal_with_vulnerable_interviewees&action=edit&redlink=1 Dealing with vulnerable interviewees]

== '''… an editorial''' ==

Editorial usually introduces the GenderIT.org's thematic edition, we often invite a guest writer (meaning someone who is for some reason a relevant voice on the theme in focus but not necessarily a core writer) to prepare an editorial and share her/his opinion on an issue. The usual suggested length for the editorial is ''no more than one page, or 350 words''.

The editorial is meant to introduce the theme of the edition, promote critical thinking, and encourage readers to read the edition and/or take action on the issue. They use a personal tone, and share personal opinions and experiences, including possible solutions to the issue in focus work often bests. What is extremely important for the development of the editorial is that the guest writer has in hand all the materials for the upcoming edition, so she/he can go through them and have a sense of what the edition is about, and even be able to make reference or quote the particular articles.

''Check [http://www.genderit.org/previous-editorials previous editorials] for reference:''

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/tipping-balance-local-adopters-technology Tipping the balance for local adopters of technology]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/internet-governance-if-we-are-not-table-we-will-be-menu Internet governance: If we are not at the table, we will be on the menu]

[http://www.genderit.org/editorial/thoughts-around-claiming-communication-rights Claiming communication rights]

== '''… a resource summary''' ==

Even though resources are usually pdf formatted papers or presentations that are stand alone materials, we do not just throw them on the website without an introduction that sparks the interest of the readership. Here are some simple steps to follow when writing the summary:

1) State the purpose of a document/report. Why was it written?
2) Briefly describe the scope of the report. What problem does it solve or what issues are covered?
3) Provide an overview of the research/data collection methods used. How was information for the report gathered? (if applicable)
4) State the key results and findings detailed in the report. What did you find out?
5) Present the main conclusions and recommendations. What should the reader do about it?
6) How does it relate to women’s and internet rights?

The optimal length for a resource summary is ''between 500-700 words''.

See example: [http://www.genderit.org/resources/erotics-sex-rights-and-internet-research-study EROTICS: Sex, rights and the internet - an exploratory research study]

''Read more:''

[http://www.ehow.com/how_5108728_write-report-summary.html#ixzz1UX3KgGXp How to write a report summary]

[http://www.apc.org/system/files/multilingual_audience_guidelines.pdf Writing for a multilingual audience]: Some Do’s and Dont's for native and near-native English language writers.

[http://www.apc.org/en/system/files/APCReferenceGuide_200905.pdf APC reference guide]: A thorough list of reference types and how to use them in APC and GenderIT.org publications.

== '''Checklist for ALL articles''' ==

Every article submitted to GenderIT.org should contain these elements:

''Heading:'' This is where you persuade readers that they should read your story.

''Summary or lead:'' One or two sentences that summarise the main point of your article, again to persuade the reader to read further.

''Biography:'' Two or three lines describing who you are – even if you are writing anonymously this could give readers some context of the work that you do.

Lastly check that your references meet the reference guidelines listed above.

== '''[[How to publish content in GenderIT.org]]''' ==

Now you have the finalised piece but it is not published in the website yet. This section aims to give you a step-by-step orientation so you can upload all the materials yourself using our Drupal platform.

Our ideas

2016-04-19T14:22:45Z

Flavia: Created page with " '''Topic:''' The Avocado Matter: An interview with Paz Pena of Derechos Digitales on communications for advocacy Deadline: Description: Languages: ES (EN FR) Project:..."

'''Topic:''' The Avocado Matter: An interview with Paz Pena of Derechos Digitales on communications for advocacy

Deadline:

Description:

Languages: ES (EN FR)

Project: Comms

Assigned:

Status:

'''Topic:''' DDoS attack on National Network of Abortion Funders

Deadline:

Description:

Languages: EN

Project: Comms

Assigned: Kendra Moyer

Status: Editing, payment

'''Topic:''' Internet Archive crawls all APC and APC member websites

Deadline:

Description: https://archive-it.org/static/files/archiveit_brochure.pdf

Languages: EN (ES FR)

Project: Comms

Assigned:

Status:

'''Topic:''' Regional member meeting report from 2015 towards 2016 (with Chat and Karel)

Deadline:

Description:

Languages: EN ES FR

Project: Network Dev

Assigned:

Status:

'''Topic:'''

Deadline:

Description:

Languages:

Project:

Assigned:

Status:

'''Topic:'''

Deadline:

Description:

Languages:

Project:

Assigned:

Status:

Main Page

2016-04-19T14:22:25Z

Flavia: /* Articles topics brainstorming */

== '''Introducing GenderIT.org''' ==

[[File:doc.jpg|50px]]''' [[What is GenderIT.org]]'''

This page is designed to tell you who GenderIT.org is and to show you where the website sits in relation to other websites of the Association for Progressive Communications.

[[File:doc.jpg|50px]]''' [[GenderIT.org's manifesto: What we do and why]]'''

This document aims to give a concise overview of what drives GenderIT.org and the editorial principles by which it operates.

[[File:doc.jpg|50px]]''' [[Our code of ethics]]'''

The aim of this document is to provide a clear understanding of the ethical responsibilities of those who write for the website, whether authors of articles or those leaving comments.

[[File:audience.jpg|50px]]''' [[Who does GenderIT.org speak to]]'''

Here you will find an overview of our main audiences and an explanation of why they are relevant for us.

[[File:coverage.jpg|50px]] '''[[GenderIT.org's interests for coverage]]'''

This section gives an overview of the main issues and areas covered by GenderIT.org.

[[File:team.jpg|50px]]''' [[GenderIT.org editorial team]]'''

Here you will find names, definition of roles, contact details and guidance on who to talk to about all that relates to GenderIT.org.

== '''Introducing APCNews''' ==

[[File:doc.jpg|50px]]''' [[What is APCNews?]]'''

This page is designed to tell you who APCNews is and to show you where the content produced for APCNews sits in relation to other websites of the Association for Progressive Communications.

[[File:doc.jpg|50px]]''' [[Editorial policy]]'''

APCNews editorial policy establishes the focus of interest, values, language and other standards that information produced by the APC must follow.

[[File:audience.jpg|50px]]''' [[Who does APCNews speak to]]'''

Here you will find an overview of our main audiences and an explanation of why they are relevant for us.

[[File:coverage.jpg|50px]]''' [[APCNews interests for coverage]]'''

This section gives an overview of the main issues and areas covered by APCNews.

[[File:team.jpg|50px]]''' [[APCNews editorial team]]'''

Here you will find names, definition of roles, contact details and guidance on who to talk to about all that relates to APCNews.

== '''Orientation for new writers and editors''' ==

[[File:tool.jpg|50px]] '''[[Orientation for new writers in GenderIT.org]]'''

Starting as a writer in GenderIT.org? You must have lots of questions on the procedures and expectations, so we put together this page to orientate you in this process.

[[File:tool.jpg|50px]] '''[[Orientation for new writers in APCNews]]'''

Starting as a writer in APCNews? You must have lots of questions on the procedures and expectations, so we put together this page to orientate you in this process.

[[File:style.jpg|50px]] '''[[A guide for new editors]]'''

This is a series of guides to help editors new to GenderIT.org and APCNews to understand the priorities for the sites and provide a quick reference to important documents that you may need in your work.

[[File:FAQ.jpg|50px]] '''[[Frequently Asked Questions]]'''

Here are many of the questions our writers have raised before, and we answer them for you in case you share them.

== '''Articles topics brainstorming''' ==

[[File:Ideas.jpg|50px]] In this page we drop all those good ideas that we have for future articles.

Check [[our ideas]]!

== '''Resources to keep close while working''' ==

[[File:notes.jpg|50px]] '''[[Meetings and notes]]'''

This is a repository of all editorial meeting notes and a calendar of upcoming meetings.

[[File:style.jpg|50px]] '''[[Style guide]]'''

This page gives advice and guidelines on the technicalities of writing for both GenderIT.org and APCNews.

[[File:style.jpg|50px]] '''[[Reference guide]]'''

APCNews, including GenderIT.org, follows an adapted version of the American Psychological Association (APA) style of referencing. Here you will find useful reminders and examples on how to apply it.

[[File:style.jpg|50px]] '''[http://www.apc.org/system/files/multilingual_audience_guidelines.pdf Writing English texts for a multilingual audience]'''

Here you will find some do’s and dont's for native and near-native English language writers

[[File:audio.jpg|50px]] '''[[How to work with audio]]'''

The aim of this guide is to offer information and resources that will provide a road-map for those new to the medium of audio, while also providing quick links and reference for those with some experience who want a refresher on particular topics or questions.

[[File:video.jpg|50px]] '''[[How to work with video]]'''

The aim of this guide is to offer information and resources that will provide a road-map for those new to the medium of video, while also providing quick links and reference for those with some experience who want a refresher on particular topics or questions.

[[File:photo.jpg|50px]] '''[[How to work with photographs]]'''

The aim of this guide is to offer information and resources that will help provide technical tips on how to take a good photograph, while also providing quick links and reference for those with some experience who want a refresher on particular topics or questions.

[[File:aid.jpg|50px]] '''[[How to deal with vulnerable interviewees]]'''

This guide contains resources and important considerations to be put in place when conducting interviews, particularly with survivors of violence and sexual harassment.

[[File:coverage.jpg|50px]] '''[[General orientation for events coverage]]'''

GenderIT.org and APCNews have been recognised for the coverage done in events by readers and writers, becoming one of its substantial outputs. Here you will find a guide on how to proceed during an event coverage.

[[File:security.jpg|50px]] '''[[Secure online communications]]'''

Security is an important issue for us. As The Lorax say in the Dr Seuss film “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It’s not.” Here you will find APC's secure online communications policy on how to keep yourself safe, and the people you work with.

[[File:far.jpg|50px]] '''[[Far away so close: First steps in online work]]'''

We are far away, but working close. This section will help you understand how we develop our work being in different parts of the world and rarely seeing our colleagues face-to-face.

[[File:style.jpg|50px]] '''[http://www.apc.org/en/glossary/6 Glossary]'''

The APC glossary is a work-in-progress one. All the terms that are in the glossary appear highlighted throughout the website, with a link to its definition. So it’s a tool both for language workers and for the general public. If you feel that a new term should be added, please write to translation@apc.org

[[File:photo.jpg|50px]] '''[[Gallery of pictures]]'''

Looking for images to illustrate your material? Or just curious to see some of the team members at work? Then this is the place!